Home> Company News> Medical-Grade vs. Cosmetic-Grade Plastic Parts: Three Key Differences to Consider in Mold Design

Medical-Grade vs. Cosmetic-Grade Plastic Parts: Three Key Differences to Consider in Mold Design

2025,09,11
 
 
In the manufacturing of high-end packaging and medical devices, the choice of plastic material directly determines product success or failure. While medical-grade and cosmetic-grade materials may appear similar, they differ fundamentally from material selection criteria to mold design logic. This article, drawing on international certification standards such as FDA and REACH, as well as industry case studies, analyzes the key differences between these two types of materials in mold design, helping injection mold manufacturers mitigate development risks.
b66ceb9be9634bdea41e678171ad9bef_7
Difference 1: Material Certification Standards and Mold Compatibility Design
 
Core Conflict
 
Medical-grade: Must meet mandatory certifications such as FDA 21 CFR and ISO 10993 biocompatibility. Materials must withstand high-temperature steam sterilization (e.g., PC must withstand temperatures above 120°C).
 
Cosmetic-grade: Focusing on EU regulations such as EC 1223/2009, materials must be compatible with alcohol wipes and fragrance penetration (e.g., PMMA requires higher chemical resistance).
 
Mold Design Impact
Hot Runner System Optimization:
 
Medical materials (such as PEEK) have a low melt index, requiring a large hot runner cross-section to prevent cold material blockage. A YUDO hot nozzle with a PID temperature control module is recommended.
 
Cosmetic materials (such as AS) have good flowability, so a needle-valve hot runner can be used for precise dispensing and reduced weld lines.
 
Cooling Water Path Differences:
 
Material Type
 
Cooling Requirements
 
Mold Steel Recommendations
 
Medical Grade (such as TPU)
 
Fast Cooling to Avoid Crystallization Defects
 
S136 Mirror Steel (HRC ≥ 52)
 
Cosmetic Grade (such as ABS)
 
Slow Cooling to Ensure Surface Gloss
 
NAK80 Pre-hardened Steel
 
Differentiation Point 2: Surface Treatment and Mold Life Management
 
Functional Requirements Comparison
 
Medical Grade: The surface must achieve a mirror finish of Ra ≤ 0.2μm to prevent microbial adhesion, and nickel plating is prohibited (to avoid allergic reactions).
 
Cosmetic-grade: For high-gloss textures (such as diamond grain and IMD transfer), a 0.05-0.1mm etching margin should be reserved [citation:9].
 
Key Process Implementation Points
Differences in Steel Pretreatment:
 
Medical molds require electro-discharge machining (EDM) followed by mirror polishing to eliminate microscopic pores; cosmetic molds can be directly CNC-engraved.
 
Maintenance Cycle Management:
 
Medical molds require plasma cleaning every 5,000 cycles, while cosmetic molds require routine maintenance every 20,000 cycles.
 
Difference Point 3: Tolerance Accuracy and Mold Structure Design
Precision Standard Comparison
Indicators
 
Medical Grade (e.g., IV Connectors)
 
Cosmetic Grade (e.g., Lipstick Tubes)
 
Dimensional Tolerance
 
±0.01mm
 
±0.03mm
 
Coaxiality Requirements
 
≤0.005mm
 
≤0.02mm
 
Parting Surface Matching Accuracy
 
Zero-Step Design
 
Permitted Step ≤0.05mm
 
Mold Structure Solutions
Guide System Enhancement:
 
Medical molds require ball guide pins with taper positioning, achieving a repeatability of ±0.002mm; cosmetic molds can use conventional guide pins.
 
Exhaust System Design:
 
The porosity of medical products must be less than 0.1%. A 0.003mm stepped exhaust system with a vacuum-assisted system is recommended; cosmetic molds use conventional exhaust grooves.
 
Conclusion: Risk Control Strategies for Cross-Discipline Material Applications
Dual-Track Verification Mechanism: New projects must undergo simultaneous ISO 13485 medical device quality management system validation and cosmetics GMP review.
 
Digital Collaboration: Moldflow mold flow analysis software was used to simulate the filling stability of medical materials and the surface flow mark index of cosmetic materials.
 
Supply Chain Audit: Medical material suppliers must provide USP Class VI certification, and cosmetic materials must pass 26 allergen tests.
 

ZIBO HUIWEN Plastics offers a full range of plastic molding capabilities to efficiently mass-produce parts specializing in injection molding and have served customers in variety of industries such as medical, automotive, packaging, construction, home appliances , and agriculture. The company has two factories which occupy a total area of more than 18,000 square meters, and a total of 102 sets of injection molding machines .

 

COmpetitive products:

3.500+ Material Choices Custom Injection Molding
 
Contact Us

Author:

Mr. Kama Liu

Phone/WhatsApp:

+86 15069372818

Popular Products
You may also like
Related Categories

Email to this supplier

Subject:
Email:
Message:

Your message must be betwwen 20-8000 characters

Copyright © 2025 ZIBO HUIWEN NEW MATERIAL CO., LTD All rights reserved. Privacy Policy

We will contact you immediately

Fill in more information so that we can get in touch with you faster

Privacy statement: Your privacy is very important to Us. Our company promises not to disclose your personal information to any external company with out your explicit permission.

Send